In a Reuters report, three senior judges and 12 prominent economic and criminal law officials called the bill “one of the greatest challenges in Hong Kong`s legal system.” They feared that it would “put the courts on a trajectory of conflict with Beijing” because the limited scope of extradition hearings would leave them little room for manoeuvre. They feared that if they tried to prevent high-level suspects from being sent across the border, they would be subjected to criticism and political pressure from Beijing. Judges and lawyers have said that under the UK-based common law system in Hong Kong, extraditions are based on the presumption of fair trial and human punishment in the host country – a presumption they say the Chinese legal system controlled by the Communist Party deserved nothing.  The Hong Kong government itself appears to have inadvertently made the purpose of the law the theme of “reason of being”. In response to strong pressure from pro-Chinese local politicians and companies and politicians, it has introduced legislative amendments that should serve as protective measures, including the provision that extradition requests must be made by central authorities to a court. The Hong Kong government also issued a “serious rebuke” against the US announcement, which accused the United States of “politicizing legal cooperation.” Hong Kong has extradition agreements with 20 countries, including Britain and the United States, but despite ongoing negotiations over the past two decades, no such agreement has been reached with mainland China. On May 30, Security Minister John Lee introduced six new measures to limit the number of crimes likely to be extradited and raise the bar for those punished from three years to seven years or more – a central claim of the Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce (HKGCC). Only applications from the highest judicial bodies of an applicant court, namely the Supreme People`s Bar and the Supreme Court of the People of Mainland China, can be considered. Lee`s announcement came hours after a group of 39 pro-Beijing lawmakers called for a change in the law. Their two demands – raising the threshold for extradited crimes and admitting only extradition requests from the continent`s supreme authority – were accepted by the government.
 At 8:30 p.m., the government issued a statement in which Carrie Lam apologized to Hong Kong residents and promised to “sincerely and humbly accept any criticism, improve and serve public opinion.”  A government source told the South China Morning Post that the government was stating that there was no timetable for resuscitation of the suspended law, that the law would die a “natural death” if the current mandate of the Legislative Council ended next July.  On June 18, Carrie Lam apologized for mishandleing the extradition law, but did not respond to protesters` demands to withdraw the law completely or resign.  In response to Hong Kong`s new National Security Act – and in particular its claim to apply worldwide – Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand terminated their extradition agreements with Hong Kong in July. In early August, France decided not to ratify an pending extradition agreement with Hong Kong. The United States had already threatened to terminate its contract; Now it`s official. The United States decided to lift Hong Kong`s trade privileges, while Washington`s intelligence partners, “Five Eyes,” suspended their extradition agreements with the city, with New Zealand joining Canada, the United Kingdom and Australia on Tuesday. The United States has indicated that it is preparing to do the same.