Design and implementation of sustainable development programs using permaculture as a guiding methodology

Enterprise Agreement Vs Csp

Microsoft Cloud Solution Provider opens up a new world of flexibility in software licensing and management. Instead of a 3-year bond, as is required with Microsoft EA, Microsoft CSP is full from month to month. This way, you can add or remove licenses as needed, pay only for what you actually use, which can save you significantly in the short and long term. Most importantly, since CSP agreements are provided through Microsoft partners, you also have immediate access to Microsoft Premier support – additional costs with enterprise agreements – with a dedicated team that knows you and your business, so you`ll never have to explain your problem from the beginning if you need assistance. Unlike EA, which has a minimum number of users or devices of 500, the CSP is much more flexible with the number of devices and users you can have under this agreement, making it ideal for small businesses. AAS are typically used by large companies that can manage at least 500 user licenses and need a fixed price for software and subscription licenses for 3 years. However, large companies continue to move to psC in order to obtain more flexibility and cost savings. This blog will discuss the main differences between an EA and a CSP agreement and discuss why the CSP agreement has become increasingly popular in recent years. A Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (Microsoft EA) was once the licensing vehicle for large companies with more than 500 seats. But the complex three-year contract, which was once so popular, is becoming obsolete.

As cloud-based services like Azure and Office 365 become the norm, even large companies are postponing their product and service purchases and are looking with the CSP program for a more flexible Microsoft volume licensing option. Below, you will find a comparison for reviewing the purchase through a Microsoft enterprise agreement versus the CSP program. Microsoft partners like Ensono manage the customer relationship through managed support and services. Customers pay a predictable monthly bill through the partner based on their precise use of Microsoft`s cloud services such as Azure and M365 and D365. The relationship is governed by Microsoft`s strong service level agreement, which defines critical aspects of the service such as quality and availability between the service provider and the customer. Microsoft recommends that EA be used only by large companies: with Microsoft`s CSP (cloud solution providers) program, you only pay a monthly fee for the licenses and software you need, which becomes much more convenient and less expensive for large organizations. To help you decide if you should switch to CSP, we`ve created this practical comparison diagram for EA vs. CSP, which highlights the main differences between these two agreements. Over the years, Microsoft`s EA has been a popular solution for many companies.

Its appeal came from the fact that it allowed companies to add licenses to their agreement while they go. Microsoft EA allows companies to acquire cloud services and software licenses as part of a three-year agreement. An Enterprise Agreement (EA) provides for the licensing of software and services through a single agreement that contractually locks a company into a 36-month agreement and asks them to “preserve” their licenses each year. This means that IT decision makers may have to estimate the total number of users at the beginning of each annual “true-up” cycle, which could result in higher costs.

Comments are closed.